Acme Juicer Mfg. Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to a recommended decision filed September 22, 1972, by former Trial Commissioner James F. Davis pursuant to Rule 134(h). The court has considered the case on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. Since the court agrees *386with the decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, plaintiff is not entitled to recover and plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.
OPINION OF COMMISSIONER
Davis, Oommissioner:
This suit arises under § 4121 of the Internal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carbon Steel Co. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Ayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Polaroid Corporation v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Air Lift Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.