Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 4, 2001No. 84,270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beier, J.:

Clinton McDonald appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, filed after sentencing for possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the denial of the motion to withdraw plea but remand for resentencing.

McDonald was charged with possession with intent to sell, deliver, or distribute methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Initially represented by Jason King, McDonald entered into a plea agreement. He agreed to plead guilty to the paraphernalia charge in exchange for the State’s dismissal of the other charge and its recommendation that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. State v. MinceySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. JasperSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. UristaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API