Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 11, 2008No. 97,407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

When Charles Foster entered into a plea-bargain agreement in which he agreed to plead no contest to aggravated assault, the State agreed to recommend probation if Foster s criminal-history score was level C or better. The sentencing report scored Foster’s criminal history as level C, so the State was committed to recommend probation at the sentencing hearing. But *381Fosters crime involved the use of a handgun, and K.S.A. 21-4704(h) provided that he could only receive probation if the trial court specifically found that probation would serve the interest of community safety by promoting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. UristaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. AntrimSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. UristaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API