Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 11, 2008No. 97,407Published

1Dissent

Marquardt, J.:

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

At Charles Foster’s plea hearing, the district court went through an extensive interchange with him to make sure that he understood his plea and the implications of it:

“The Court: Okay. Count I of the Second Amended Information, Mr. Foster, alleges that on or about the 15th of February of this year you did unlawfully, feloniously, and intentionally place the person of Angel Brown in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm with a deadly weapon, by putting a loaded gun against her head. This is a charge of aggravated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API