Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Gustin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Emerick, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought an action of trover against the defendants for the conversion of a stock of goods which defendants had seized and sold, as they claimed, under a chattel mortgage executed by plaintiff to them, and also for the conversion of a quantity of cedar ties, posts and telegraph poles. The cause was tried before a jury, who found a verdict for plaintiff, and the defendants allege error. All the errors assigned relate to the charge of the court.

The defendants were wholesale grocers at Bay City, and the plaintiff was a grocer at Alpena, and in connection with his business there was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Albrecht v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. State v. GambuttiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. In Re LucasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Stott v. GreengosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Scheel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API