Legal Opinion
People v. Wade
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1989No. G005611PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
Donald Wade pleaded guilty to possession of heroin and being under the influence of a controlled substance after his motion to suppress evidence was denied. Although a body cavity search of his person did not strictly conform to California law as expressed in Penal Code section 4030, that statute contains no exclusionary remedy.1 We find no basis for suppression under federal law and affirm accordingly.
I
On April 7, 1987, at approximately 8:30 p.m., Santa Ana Police Officers Wiist and Schweitzer observed a vehicle with expired registration stickers. Wiist activated the police…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Kenneth Malcolm CameronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Robert Salinas v. Chief Harold BreierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Noelle Way v. County of Ventura Robert Brooks Karen Hanson, and Robert Ortiez, Ventura Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Foster v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Noelle Way v. County of Ventura Robert Brooks Karen Hanson, and Robert Ortiez, Ventura Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- State of Arizona v. Patricia A. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Doe 1 v. BalaamDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.