Legal Opinion

United States v. Everngam

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 31, 1951No. 7906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

The defendant was charged with a violation of the Selective Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 451 et seq., in that he did knowingly refuse to submit for induction, in compliance with an order of his Local Board. He pleaded not guilty, claiming that he was denied classification as a conscientious objector solely because he was a Catholic, in violation of the statute and regulations thereunder and that he was thereby denied due process of law. The case was tried by the court in lieu of a jury. Pursuant to Rule 23(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. StilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. ZieberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. BaloghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. United States Ex Rel. Levy v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sicurella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Ex Parte FabianiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. United States v. AlviesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  5. In Re JostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API