Legal Opinion
Ilc Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 11, 1978No. C-73-2238 SC, C-73-2239 SCPublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTI, District Judge.
The jury in the trial of this action was asked to decide whether IBM monopolized or attempted to monopolize various markets in the computer industry. After five months of trial, and after the jury reported itself deadlocked, the court declared a mistrial.
IBM has moved this court for a directed verdict on the grounds that no reasonable jury could find for Memorex on any of its contentions. The court now entertains this motion.
The court, in ruling on IBM’s motion for a directed verdict, will discuss the issues and evidence and analyze the same by dividing them into…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Spray-Rite Service Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Monsanto Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.