Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Butts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: On a prior appeal in this action, we stated that H. Robert Butts, as the owner of the property on which the accident occurred, “had a nondelegable duty under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) even though the property is subject to an easement that he granted to [third-party defendant] Niagara Mohawk [Power Corporation] and even though Butts did not exercise any supervision and control over the work being performed by plaintiff [Lonnie R. Palmer] or benefit from such work” (Palmer v Alltel N. Y., 227 AD2d 914, 915, lv denied 89 NY2d 805).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Mosher v. St. Joseph's VillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. McGregor v. BravoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Blessinger v. Estee Lauder CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Palmer v. All-tel New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Widrig v. Alltell New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API