Legal Opinion

Blessinger v. Estee Lauder Companies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), *364entered July 1, 1997, which denied third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint as barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 11, as amended by section 2 of the Omnibus Workers’ Compensation Reform Act of 1996 (L 1996, ch 635 [the Act]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The issue is whether the Act, which extinguishes the right to contribution from a plaintiffs employer, except in limited circumstances not present here, bars a third-party action for contribution against the employer that was commenced after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morales v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Maher v. WhiteheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Caponi v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Whitmore v. Anthony Russo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Palmer v. ButtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API