Legal Opinion

Palmer v. All-tel New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendant’s motion granted, cross motion for partial summary judgment denied and cross motion for leave to amend the complaint granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant, Alltel New York, Inc. (Alltel), for summary judgment and granting the cross motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241. Lonnie R. Palmer (plaintiff) was injured when, during the course of his employment with third-party defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Celestine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Celestine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Murray v. Lancaster Motorsports, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Palmer v. ButtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Silk v. TurkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API