Legal Opinion
Polsky v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 13, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered October 14, 2005, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a subway station, granted the motion of defendant Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiffs cross motion to amend his notice of claim and summons and complaint nunc pro tunc so as to name the New York City Transit Authority (TA) in lieu of MTA, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
MTA’s motion for summary judgment, which was made shortly after plaintiff filed a note of issue and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cane v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Konner v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Delacruz v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cruz v. AjimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Davis v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Oquendo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017