State v. Bauman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLTAN, Judge. *
Appellant Robert Bauman challenges his conviction for driving after revocation of license, arguing that the statute requires operation of a motor vehicle on a street or highway. We affirm the conviction.
FACTS
On February 19, 1995, a sheriffs deputy stopped Bauman backing an automobile out of a space in a parking lot adjacent to the Blue Earth County Courthouse. The deputy cited Bauman for driving after revocation of his driver’s license >in violation of Minn.Stat. § 171.24. (Bauman had been at the courthouse to plead guilty to a prior charge of driving after revocation.)
B…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CoadyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FrederickNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. City of RichfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001