Legal Opinion

State v. Bauman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1996No. C4-96-193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLTAN, Judge. *

Appellant Robert Bauman challenges his conviction for driving after revocation of license, arguing that the statute requires operation of a motor vehicle on a street or highway. We affirm the conviction.

FACTS

On February 19, 1995, a sheriffs deputy stopped Bauman backing an automobile out of a space in a parking lot adjacent to the Blue Earth County Courthouse. The deputy cited Bauman for driving after revocation of his driver’s license >in violation of Minn.Stat. § 171.24. (Bauman had been at the courthouse to plead guilty to a prior charge of driving after revocation.)

B…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. CoadyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FrederickNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. City of RichfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API