Legal Opinion

Columbus Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Hardison

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1967No. 3596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Claiming to have sustained an injury resulting in a bilateral inguinal hernia in employment covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law, Dean L. Hardison filed a claim in the court below seeking an award of statutory benefits for temporary total disability. The claim was resisted by the employer, Columbus Plumbing & Heating Company. Following a hearing in the matter the trial court entered an order awarding to claimant the benefits claimed, and the employer appeals. The sole question before us is the sufficiency of the substantial evidence to sustain the award.

There is little if any, dispute in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Pangarova v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Jennings v. C. M. & W. Drilling Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bocek v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In Re HardisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Matter of Workers'compensation Claim of FanslerWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API