Legal Opinion

Bocek v. City of Sheridan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1967No. 3628PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

On December 9, 1966, Arthur J. Bocek filed a claim for temporary total disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, asserting that such disability was caused by a “herniated disc” in the lower part of the back, which in turn was the direct result of an injury incurred while employed by the City of Sheridan in a covered occupation. The city controverted the claim and the basic issues resulting were whether or not claimant incurred an injury in his employment and whether such injury was the cause of the disability claimed. After a hearing in the matter, the trial court found generally for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. White v. Maverick Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In the Matter of Workmen's Compensation Ludlow v. Wortham MacH. CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Parkel v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. DeJulio v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mayflower Restaurant Co. v. GriegoWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Black Watch Farms v. BaldwinWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Department v. BostonWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Murphy v. StevensWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API