Legal Opinion
Ross v. Mathis
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 11, 1985No. Civ. A. C-84-1309-APublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, District Judge.
Presently pending is defendants’ motion for arbitration and to stay this action pend ing arbitration. The court held a hearing on the matter on August 7, 1985. Upon review, the court grants defendants’ motion.
Plaintiff Carolyn Ross brings this action against defendants William H. Mathis and Bear Stearns and Company claiming violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a, et seq., Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., and also for breach of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cancanon v. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Shotto v. LaubDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- Creative Securities Corp. v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Scher v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.