Snider v. Snider

Bell, Justice.

Whether in view of other features of the response it might have been considered as evidence against the defendant (Code, §§ 38-402; 81-308; White Sewing Machine Co. v. Horkan, 7 Ga. App. 283 (2), 66 S. E. 811), it was not so verified as to have any probative value in his favor, although introduced in evidence by him. Byrd v. Prudential Insurance Co., 182 Ga. 800 (187 S. E. 1); Grizzel v. Grizzel, 188 Ga. 418 (2) (3 S. E. 2d, 649). The case may therefore, without harm to the defendant, be treated *386as though, the response was not introduced, and it will be so treated in the…