Legal Opinion

Bick v. Reese

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county. Action by Gerhard H. Bick, administrator of Henry Bick, deceased, to remover certain government bonds, and a mortgage owned by decedent in his life-time. A judgment on a verdict for plaintiff was affirmed on appeal, (3 H. Y. Supp. 757.) This appeal is by plaintiff from part of an order affirming •the refusal of the clerk to tax a certain item in plaintiff’s bill of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.

This suit was brought to recover from the defendant certain chattels in her possession to which she claimed title as gifts causa mortis from the plaintiff’s intestate. In order to replevy the chattels, the plaintiff procured the American Surety Company of Hew York to furnish the requisite statutory undertaking, and for this service paid that corporation $125. The -plaintiff succeeded in the action, and in his bill of costs inserted this amount as one of the necessary disbursements which he had made in the case. The clerk refused to tax it, and his refusal has been sustained by the court at…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Jarvis v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Jose v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Louisville Lumber Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Jarvis v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API