Jose v. Hunter
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Marion Superior Court (79,933); Pliny W. Bartholomew, Judge. Action by Erskine E. Hunter and another against Oscar A. Jose and another. Prom an adverse judgment defendants appealed, and there was a reversal, with costs ordered taxed against appellees. The latter move that the costs as taxed be retaxed.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
The appellees recovered a judgment against appellants in the court below, which judgment was reversed by this court on November 26, 1913, and costs in the trial court and this court were taxed to appellees, under §706 Burns 1914, §664 R. S. 1881. A petition for rehearing was denied by this court January 16, 1914, and a petition to transfer to the Supreme Court was by such court denied January 27, 1916. Appellees now move to retax certain *300costs taxed against them by the clerk of this court. As shown by this motion, the total costs taxed against appellees by such clerk aggregates $221.60, two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Blain v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Lee Injector Mfg. Co. v. Penberthy Injector Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Ensley ex rel. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eisler v. Eastern States Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Pittman-Rice Coal Co. v. HansenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Houston v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- General Grain, Inc. v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968