Legal Opinion

In re: Amber Elizabeth Kopanski v. Rumizen & Weisman Co., Ltd.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 12, 2026No. 25-01080Unknown

1Opinion

IT IS SO ORDERED. oy ‘ nh Dated: 12 May, 2026 05:14 PM - Suzarfa Krstevski Koch United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Tn re: ) Chapter 7 ) AMBER ELIZABETH KOPANSKI, ) Case No. 25-12883 ) Debtor. ) ) Judge Suzana Krstevski Koch ) RUMIZEN & WEISMAN CO., LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Adversary Proceeding ) No. 25-01080 Vv. ) ) AMBER ELIZABETH KOPANSKI, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND OPINION DENYING RUMIZEN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 51) This cause is before the Court on Rumizen & Weisman Co., Ltd.’s (the “Plaintiff” or…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API