State v. Hankey
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
Paul Albert Hankey (Hankey) appeals the judgment of conviction for a felony driving under the influence, Idaho Code §§ 18-8004 and 18-8005(7), arguing that the police obtained the evidence against him through an improper investigatory stop. The district court denied Hankey’s motion to suppress the use of the evidence. Hankey entered a conditional plea of guilty, preserving the right to appeal the denial of the suppression motion. The Court of Appeals vacated the judgment of conviction, concluding that the State had not met its burden of establishing that the investigatory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. DuValtIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Filip DanneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WilloughbyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MalandIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LarsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. Jamie Lynn PachosaIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.