Legal Opinion
State v. Willoughby
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2009No. 35289PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This appeal arises from a magistrate judge’s order granting Respondent Christopher Willoughby’s motion to suppress. The trial court held that law enforcement seized Willoughby without reasonable suspicion. The State appealed to the district court, which affirmed the trial court, and the Court of Appeals, which also affirmed. We granted the State’s petition for review. We affirm the district court’s decision affirming the trial court.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On July 4, 2005, at approximately 1:30 a.m., Officers Josh Gillmore and Timothy Carroll of the Coeur d’Alene…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Trotter v. Bank of New York MellonIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Randy Poole v. Darin DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Jose Perez-JungoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Martinez-GonzalezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.