Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Cadillac Co. v. English & Mersick Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1927No. Nos. 4643, 4644PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The defense to this suit for infringement of letters patent No. 882,136, issued to Aitmann March 17, 1908, was invalidity, infringement not being denied, if the patent was valid. There are but two claims, both of which were involved. They are:(1) In a latch for vehicle doors, the combination, with a horizontally movable bolt, of a vertically arranged shaft,, and connections between the shaft and bolt, whereby, with the rotation of the shaft, the bolt is moved.(2) In a latch for vehicle doors, the combination, with the bolt thereof, of a rotatable shaft, a cam on said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Sterling Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Motor Improvements v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Chicago Forging & Mfg. Co. v. Bade-Cummins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Meilink Steel Safe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Herz Straw Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.