Herz Straw Co. v. Smith
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit wherein the defendants are charged with having infringed claim 18 of letters patent No. 1,-660,832, granted to E. Conti on February 28, 1928, for a tube-forming machine.
The specification states that the invention contemplates the formation of a continuous tube, the cutting off of predetermined lengths of the tube during- tho movement of the tube, and the delivery of the cut-off portions from the cut-off mechanism.
The defenses allege invalidity of the claim and noninfringement.
Claim 18 reads as follows: “18. In a tube forming machine,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winget Kickernick Co. v. Kenilworth Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Cincinnati Cadillac Co. v. English & Mersick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927