Legal Opinion

Heinen v. Heinen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1947No. 3490PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

The respondent, Frances Rowley Heinen, commenced her action for a divorce from the appellant, Richard Carl Heinen, on July 11, 1946, upon the grounds of the defendant’s extreme cruelty pleaded in the words of the statute, and for the custody of the minor children of the parties, two sons of the respective ages of five and three years. Appellant answered, attacking the plaintiff’s claimed residence in the State of Nevada, denied her allegations of cruelty and prayed that she take nothing by her complaint. He sought on his part no affirmative relief. The cause was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. TynesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Bredouw v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Serpa v. PorterNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lahm v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API