Legal Opinion

Lahm v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1997No. A-95-1267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Connie L. Lahm brought this action seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly caused by her employment with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR), pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1994). At trial, a jury returned a general verdict for BNRR, and Lahm brings this appeal. On appeal, Lahm challenges various rulings made by the trial court, as well as the jury instructions submitted by the court. Because we find that the jury could reasonably have concluded from the evidence presented that Lahm’s action was…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. BusbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Bowman v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. de Vries v. L & L Custom BuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Halper v. Jewish Family & Children's ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
  4. Kuhnel v. BNSF Railway Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Halper v. Jewish Family & Children's ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API