Legal Opinion

Estate of Merrill

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1946No. L. A. 19872PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is a motion to dismiss five appeals on the ground that the principal judgment from which the appeals stem “has been fully paid and satisfied, and all questions relating thereto are now moot. ” A “ Certificate Re Dismissal,” prepared by the county clerk and filed as provided by Rule 42, Rules on Appeal (22 Cal.2d 1, 29), shows the following chronology of events pertinent to the disposition of said motion.

On December 19, 1945, judgment was entered in settlement of the final account of the former special administrator. The court had previously ordered his removal as representative of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Patterson v. KeeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Stafford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Estate of TryninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API