Legal Opinion
Hoosier Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lanam
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1923No. 11,455PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, C. J.
Action by appellees on a contract of automobile insurance.
The only error presented by this appeal is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the complaint. The policy sued on and which is made an exhibit to the complaint promises compensation among other things for: “The accidental collision of the automobile herein insured while the policy is in force, with any object, movable or immovable, * * *' provided, however, that contact with the roadbed on which said automobile is being driven, or the sides thereof, shall not be regarded as a collision, and is not a risk…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bouse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Southern Casualty Co. v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Stuht v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
- Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Shedd v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.