Legal Opinion
Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. Victor L. Ager, Doing Business as Totowa Concrete Block Company and Two Guys From Harrison, Totowa, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 6, 1961No. 13276_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
In this action appellant, the present owner of United States Patent No. 2,-794,375, issued to Domenick and Peter Di Falco, has sued appellee and others for patent infringement. On motion for summary judgment, the court below found the patent in suit invalid both because the device lacked invention and because its claims had been anticipated by the prior art. From the consequent order dismissing the suit, this appeal has been taken.
The patent in suit is for a prefabricated curbing designed for installation on parking lots as a bumper or stop for automobiles. The basic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Pic Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.