Legal Opinion
Charles Mull v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1969No. 22524PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The indictment in this case reads as follows:
“On or about the 4th day of June, 1966, within the District of Arizona, CHARLES MULL, an Indian, and on the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously, without just cause or excuse, upon the person of one Juana Brooks, an Indian, commit an assault with a dangerous weapon, to-wit: a razor knife, with the intent on the part of the said CHARLES MULL to do bodily harm to the said Juana Brooks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153.”
Mull was found guilty by a jury and sentenced to five years. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Violet BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.