Legal Opinion
O'CONNELL v. Brady
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
The plaintiff in this action of interpleader sought to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy in which his decedent was the insured. The insurer, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and the beneficiary in the policy, Phoebe Brady, were named defendants. By an interlocutory judgment the defendant insurance company was allowed to pay into court the proceeds of the policy less its expenses and was discharged from further liability. The defendant Phoebe Brady, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was directed to interplead with the plaintiff as to their respective claims. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. Home National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co v. McCartySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Bachrach v. HerrupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- C. E. Shepard & Co. v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Shaw v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Engelman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Klebanoff v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Bimestefer v. BimesteferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Sayre W. Klebanoff, United States of America, Intervening v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and on Interpleader Counterclaim v. Sayre W. Klebanoff, on Interpleader Counterclaim, the Tradesmens National Bank of New Haven, and W. Paul Flynn, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Estates of Sayre W. Klebanoff and M. Edward Klebanoff, on Interpleader CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.