Legal Opinion

Flores v. Hagobian

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2017No. 13-16880, No. 13-16884, No. 15-15472Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs Joe and Connie Flores appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) from orders allowing the intervention of the bankruptcy trustees for the bankruptcy estates of defendants in two actions under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. We dismiss these appeals as moot because it would be impossible for us to grant the Floreses any effective relief. See R.E.B. v. State of Haw. Dep’t of Educ., 870 F.3d 1025, 1027 (9th Cir. 2017) (per curiam); Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo Cty., 863 F.3d 1144, 1155…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Marilyn Scheer v. Patrick KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. R.E.B. v. Hawaii Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API