Legal Opinion
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2017No. 15-16604PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:
The Bishop Paiute Tribe (the “Tribe”) seeks a declaration that they have the right to “investigate violations of tribal, state, and federal law, detain, and trans port or deliver a non-Indian violator [encountered on the reservation] to the proper authorities.” Before reaching, this issue, the district court dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds, concluding that the case presents no actual case or controversy. On appeal, we are also asked to assess whether the district court, had subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Because questions of federal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Harrison Orr v. PlumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Dan Clark v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- American Diabetes Ass'n v. US Dept. of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Unified Data Services, LLC v. FTCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.