Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Wade

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 26, 1974No. CA 3-74-370-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., Chief Judge.

The Court has previously considered this case upon an application by the plaintiff for a preliminary injunction. See, Bradford v. Wade, 376 F.Supp. 45 (N.D.Tex., 1974). Now it must address itself to the merits and appropriate final relief possibilities.

The Court finds and concludes that it has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties and that venue is proper.

Since the parties chose not to present further evidence at the trial on the merits, the facts as set out in the earlier Opinion provide the basis for this one.

No evidence was ever…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bulk Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
  2. Llewelyn v. Oakland County Prosecutor's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  3. Bradford v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API