Adlard v. Rodgers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action for the specific recovery of certain personal property, to wit: a steam-boiler, engine, washing-machine,-and other articles used in a steam laundry, by plaintiff, as a mortgagee under a chattel mortgage, against the defendant, who justified his seizure and taking thereof as a constable under a writ of attachment issued in an action against the mortgagors and their assigns.
Defendant had judgment. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. *
*330On the fifteenth day of August, 1893, John W. Mussel-man, Ed M.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex parte NicholasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hackett v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Harms v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Bell v. SageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Loosemore v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Chelhar v. Acme GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rolando v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.