Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 20, 2015No. 14-1236 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Military Pay and Disability Retirement Claims; Accrual of Claims.
OPINION AND ORDER
Bush, Senior Judge.
This military pay and disability retirement benefits case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss filed under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. 1 For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND 2
1. Overview of Claims
The pro se complaint filed in this ease contains two overarching claims. First, plaintiff requests relief…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Pipes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Henderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Labonte v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.