Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 59(b)(1); Untimely Motion for Reconsideration; Re-Arguing Position Previously Rejected by the Court.
ORDER
LYNN J. BUSH Senior Judge
Now pending before the court is pro se plaintiff Antonio Johnson’s motion for reconsideration, filed May 5, 2016, which cites Rule 59 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). 1 Plaintiff requests reconsideration of the court’s “March 10, 2016 ruling in favor of defendant the United States and dismissing [Mr. Johnson’s] complaint with prejudice.” Pl.’s Rule 59 Mot. at 1. Also before the court are plaintiffs “Motion for Leave to File…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Stephen W. Richey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Circle K Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Spengler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Arkham Technology Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Bratcher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.