Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. McDonald

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1937No. Motion No. 12907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERMAN, Commissioner.

Defendants in error have filed an able motion for rehearing, urging a review of certain questions not fully discussed in original opinion. They were not discussed because we were of the opinion that the question on which the decision was based disposed of the case. So far as the right of defendants in error to be restored to office and to recover emoluments of office was concerned, the former decision settled the case. It is urged, however, that a cause of action for reinstatement in the classified service of the city of Dallas was sufficiently alleged and proved.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Toomey v. McCaffreySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. City of Houston v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of San Antonio v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Bichsel v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Miller v. City of Alamo HeightsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Sawyer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API