Legal Opinion
Bichsel v. Carver
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 2, 1958No. 13330PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This is a mandamus proceeding. Duke Carver, Jr., a suspended City policeman, brought this action against the City of San Antonio and the Chief of Police, seeking reinstatement after he was indefinitely suspended. He also asked for an injunction against a hearing before the Civil Service Commission. All material facts are agreed upon. Carver claimed that the Civil Service Commission had once reinstated him and that a second hearing before the Civil Service Commission is an illegal procedure. The trial court granted both the mandamus for reinstatement and the temporary injunction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Amarillo v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Fort Wayne v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Barry v. ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lilienthal v. City of WyandotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bichsel v. CarverTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Houston v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- City of Corpus Christi v. StoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Bichsel v. CarverTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Houston v. Williams, Steve, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003