Love v. Huffines
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Long, J., May Term, 1909, of G-uilfoRD. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaleeR, J.
Tbis is an action originally commenced before a justice of tbe peace to recover tbe sum of $194.78. "We will say in tbe beginning tbat we do not approve tbe method of pleading generally adopted in tbe State, of issuing a summons for a de*379fendant, merely requiring Mm to appear and answer a complaint upon a cause of action not stated in the summons and not after-wards stated before the magistrate and recorded in his docket. "We again call the attention of the profession to the provision of the statute that a plaintiff must somewhere, either in the summons or in the complaint before the justice,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blair v. Coakley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Johnson v. Andrews.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Southern Pants Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Erwin v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Johnson v. Reformers.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rawls v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Starr Electric Co. v. Lipe Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Lindsey v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of HonorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916