Legal Opinion

State v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hoice, J\,

after stating tbe case: Tbe appearance bond on which tbe judgment has been entered is in terms as follows:

We, Charlie Hutchins and R. S. Russ, of said county, acknowledge ourselves to be severally indebted to the State of North Carolina in the sum of $100 to be well and truly paid if default shall be made in the following condition:

The condition of this recognizance is such tbat if the said Charlie Hutchins shall personally appear at the next criminal term of the Superior Court of Forsyth County, to be held at the courthouse in Winston-Salem on 3 October, 1921, then and there to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . SaleebySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. State v. Schenck.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. W. A. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CorlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. CarusoWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API