Kingston v. Ameritrade, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 William and Virginia Kingston appeal from the October 19,1999, order of the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, granting Ameritrade’s combined motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
¶2 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it concluded that the arbitration provision in the Ameritrade contract is valid and enforceable and, therefore, the Kingstons are compelled to arbitrate their dispute with Ameritrade.
BACKGROUND
¶3 In January 1998 the Kingstons opened a cash…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jack B. Cohen, Betty L. Cohen v. Wedbush, Noble, Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep DodgeMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Bullock v. Philip Morris, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Willems v. U. S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.