Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 3, 1993No. 1920618, 1920717 and 1920861PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion addresses three separate actions against Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company. John S. Kelly and Mark Will appeal from summary judgments in favor of Connecticut Mutual in their separate actions; and Michael P. Kilcullen appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Connecticut Mutual and H. Brantley Sanders. We affirm all three judgments.

"A summary judgment is proper when there exists no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining whether a summary judgment was properly entered, this Court will view the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Chatham v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Crowder v. Memory Hill Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Adams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Wheeler v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API