Legal Opinion
Byham v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 19, 1949No. Appeal, 51PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Fine, J.,
Richard J. Byham, appellant filed his application with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for a certificate of convenience authorizing him to transport as a common carrier persons upon call and demand in the City of Meadville, Crawford County. William E. Toboz, intervening appellee, doing business as Lafayette Taxi Service, a certificated carrier within the City of Meadville, filed a protest to the application. Hearings were held on the application and the Commission, on December 6, 1946, entered an order dismissing the application. This appeal followed.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Yellow Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Colombo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hubert v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hutchison v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Alers v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Limelight Limousine, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.