Legal Opinion

Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Bennettsville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1994No. 24027PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bristow, Acting Associate Justice:

Carolina Power and Light, Inc. (Carolina) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that the Rural Electric Cooperative Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 33-49-10 to -1330, does not prohibit Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Marlboro) from selling electric power to the City of Bennettsville (Bennettsville). We disagree and affirm.

I. FACTS

Bennettsville is a municipal corporation with a population of 9,345 that owns and operates its own electric utility. Since 1951, Bennettsville has purchased electricity at wholesale from Carolina, an investor-owned utility, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API