Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Bennettsville
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bristow, Acting Associate Justice:
Carolina Power and Light, Inc. (Carolina) contends that the trial judge erred in ruling that the Rural Electric Cooperative Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 33-49-10 to -1330, does not prohibit Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Marlboro) from selling electric power to the City of Bennettsville (Bennettsville). We disagree and affirm.
I. FACTS
Bennettsville is a municipal corporation with a population of 9,345 that owns and operates its own electric utility. Since 1951, Bennettsville has purchased electricity at wholesale from Carolina, an investor-owned utility, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
3Cited by29 opinions
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.