Legal Opinion
Bye v. Cianbro Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 09-02052-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG*, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Darren Bye (“Bye”) and his wife (“Mrs. Bye”) (collectively, the “Byes”) bring this suit for damages against his employer, Cianbro Corporation1 (“Cianbro”), for injuries sustained by Bye in the course of his employment while performing repair work on a Connecticut bridge. Specifically, the Byes allege (1) that, given the conditions of the worksite, Cianbro knew that Bye’s injuries were substantially certain and that, as a result, Bye properly may bring suit despite the otherwise governing rule of workers’ compensation exclusivity with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lucenti v. LavieroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Doe v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020