Legal Opinion

Smith v. Berg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1932No. 28,984Published

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Action in Minnesota to recover from defendants, residents therein, upon a judgment against them in the municipal court of the city of Chicago, Illinois. The judgment was entered on a promissory note, payable in Chicago, pursuant to authority conferred in a warrant of attorney to confess judgment.

The complaint declared on the judgment. The answer denied any indebtedness to plaintiffs; alleged that the Illinois court had no jurisdiction to render the judgment; that in a transaction involving a real estate deal in Chicago false representations were made relative to it and the income therefrom;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wismo Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API