In the Interest of C.O.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the juvenile court’s Order suppressing the statements made by C.O. We affirm.
The juvenile court has set forth the relevant underlying factual history as follows, in pertinent part:
On February 3, 2011, in three separate cases, [C.O.] made voluntary, counseled admissions to committing felony sex offenses, including sexual abuse of children, indecent assault, and multiple counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, against three ... children. Based on the admissions, plus information concerning [C.O.] that was provided…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Lites, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014