Legal Opinion

Heaney v. Colonial Filling Stations, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 25, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkaley, J.

These are actions of tort for personal injuries caused by the plaintiff, a pedestrian, falling on the westerly side of Gorham Street, a public way in the city of Lowell, which she alleges was in a defective condition. Verdicts having been ordered for the defendants, the cases are before us on the plaintiff’s exceptions.

It was admitted that the accident happened at a driveway on the westerly side of, and within the limits of the travelled part of Gorham Street, a public way which the city was required to maintain, and that notice of the time, place, and cause of the accident was given. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salisbury v. HerchenroderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Commonwealth v. ByardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Britton v. Inhabitants of CummingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Burke v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Joyner v. Inhabitants of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Johnson v. Town of OrangeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Hopkins v. Sefton Fibre Can CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Abrahams v. ZismanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Clohecy v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API