Legal Opinion

Clohecy v. City of Haverhill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 2, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The plaintiff brings this appeal from the decision and order of the Appellate Division for the Northern District dismissing a report from the Central District Court of Northern Essex. The trial judge found that on February 17, 1934, at about 8:30 a.m., the plaintiff, while walking on the sidewalk of Emerson Street, a public way in the *379city of Haverhill, tripped on a stepping stone and fell, receiving injuries. The sidewalk was about six feet wide. The stepping stone had a flat top surface measuring sixteen inches by twenty-one inches; it rose above the gutter nine and one half inches and four…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Dubois v. . City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Macomber v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Gregoire v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Robert v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Town of Nantucket v. BeineckeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Howe v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. City of Boston v. A. W. Perry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API